I don't find the language too technical at all and concepts are well explained. You might want to consider including a specific example in psychology within the falsifiability section - you mention several but providing a more detailed walk-through might benefit a novice reader. I think the inability to test a Freudian "theory" is less obvious to someone not well versed in psychological science.
Oh. Good Point - I got similar advice on the first post from my writers' critique group! I sometimes assume more knowledge by others - the curse of knowledge.
I don't find the language too technical at all and concepts are well explained. You might want to consider including a specific example in psychology within the falsifiability section - you mention several but providing a more detailed walk-through might benefit a novice reader. I think the inability to test a Freudian "theory" is less obvious to someone not well versed in psychological science.
Oh. Good Point - I got similar advice on the first post from my writers' critique group! I sometimes assume more knowledge by others - the curse of knowledge.